• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

McCarter & English Logo

  • People
  • Services
  • Insights
  • Our Firm
    • Leadership Team
    • Social Justice
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
    • Pro Bono
    • Client Service Values
    • Alumni
  • Join Us
    • Lawyers
    • Summer Associates
    • Patent Professionals
    • Professional Staff
    • Job Openings
  • Locations
    • Boston
    • Philadelphia
    • East Brunswick
    • Indianapolis
    • Stamford
    • Hartford
    • Trenton
    • Miami
    • Washington, DC
    • New York
    • Wilmington
    • Newark
  • Share

Share

Browse Alphabetically:

  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • E
  • F
  • G
  • H
  • I
  • J
  • K
  • L
  • M
  • N
  • O
  • P
  • Q
  • R
  • S
  • T
  • U
  • V
  • W
  • X
  • Y
  • Z
  • All
Bankruptcy, Restructuring & Litigation
Blockchain, Smart Contracts & Digital Currencies
Business Litigation
Cannabis
Coronavirus Resource Center
Corporate
Crisis Management
Cybersecurity & Data Privacy
Delaware Corporate, LLC & Partnership Law
Design, Fashion & Luxury
E-Discovery & Records Management
Energy & Utilities
Environment & Energy
Financial Institutions
Food & Beverage
Government Affairs
Government Contracts & Global Trade
Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
Healthcare
Hospitality
Immigration
Impact Investing
Insurance Recovery, Litigation & Counseling
Intellectual Property
Labor & Employment
Life Sciences
Manufacturing
Products Liability, Mass Torts & Consumer Class Actions
Public Finance
Real Estate
Renewable Energy
Sports & Entertainment
Tax & Employee Benefits
Technology Transactions
Transportation, Logistics & Supply Chain Management
Trusts, Estates & Private Clients
Venture Capital & Emerging Growth Companies
  • Broadcasts
  • Events
  • News
  • Publications
  • View All Insights
Search By:
Insights News Newspaper Stack
Main image for Appraisal Arbitrage Risk: Delaware Court Finds Fair Value to be Lower than Merger Price
Publications|Alert

Appraisal Arbitrage Risk: Delaware Court Finds Fair Value to be Lower than Merger Price

Delaware Law Update

6.6.2017

On May 30, 2017, the Delaware Court of Chancery delivered a rare opinion, stating an appraisal price may be lower than a merger price, to a plaintiff recognized as an appraisal arbitrager.

In re Appraisal of SWS Group, Inc. arose out of the January 1, 2015, acquisition of SWS, a financially struggling bank and broker-dealer firm, by one of its principal creditors, Hilltop Holdings, Inc. The plaintiffs argued that SWS was worth a fair value of $9.61 per share, a 50% premium against the $6.92 merger price. The defendant argued that the merger price was based heavily upon synergies, while the going concern had a fair value of $5.74. The plaintiffs had bought their shares as part of a transparent arbitrage strategy. After a four-day trial, the court determined a fair value of $6.38.   

Vice Chancellor Sam Glasscock III first ruled that merger price was an inadequate measure of fair value because the acquirer/creditor effectively held a veto against other potential bidders through its credit agreement, also noting that the acquirer did not assert the merger price was fair value. The vice chancellor then briefly rejected the plaintiffs’ comparable companies analysis, finding a lack of record evidence to support the proffered comparables.

The court then turned to the parties’ conflicting DCF measures of fair value. There the court made numerous legal rulings, walking through DCF elements: (a) management projections of rapid, straight-line growth should not be expanded from three to five years to reach a supposed “steady state”; (b) Hilltop’s exercise of warrants in order to vote for the merger with the associated reduction in interest expense was part of the company’s “operative reality” on the merger date; (c) an increase in regulatory capital was not properly treated as an increase in distributable free cash; (d) the defense expert’s terminal growth rate was correct; (e) Chancery precedent endorsed the supply-side equity risk premium absent a factual reason to instead employ a historic ERP; (f) though both sides’ beta proffers were flawed, the defendant’s was unreliable for incorporating periods of merger speculation “froth”; and finally, (g) the size premium should be the midpoint of the two expert analyses, because the company bore similarities to a private company based on its large number of outstanding exercisable warrants.

In closing, the court observed that a fair value lower than the merger price “is not surprising” because the evidence proved a synergy-driven transaction in which some synergy value was shared with the target via the merger price.

SWS exemplifies the risks inherent in an appraisal arbitrage strategy and demonstrates the Court of Chancery’s willingness to declare an appraisal fair value lower than a merger price.  

sidebar

pdfemail

Related People

Media item: Andrew S. Dupre
Andrew S. Dupre

Partner

Related Services

Delaware Corporate, LLC & Partnership Law
Corporate
Subscribe to our Insights
McCarter & English, LLP
Copyright © 2023 McCarter & English, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
  • Login
  • Attorney Advertising
  • Privacy
  • Awards Methodology
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Sitemap

The McCarter & English, LLP website is for informational purposes only. We do not provide legal advice on this website. We can provide legal advice only to our clients in specific inquiries that they address to us. If you are interested in becoming a client, please contact us, but do not send any information about your specific legal question. We cannot serve as your lawyers until we establish an attorney-client relationship, which can occur only after we follow procedures within our firm and after we agree to the terms of the representation.

Accept Cancel