• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

McCarter & English Logo

  • People
  • Services
  • Insights
  • Our Firm
    • Leadership Team
    • Social Justice
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
    • Pro Bono
    • Client Service Values
    • Alumni
  • Join Us
    • Lawyers
    • Summer Associates
    • Patent Professionals
    • Professional Staff
    • Job Openings
  • Locations
    • Boston
    • Philadelphia
    • East Brunswick
    • Indianapolis
    • Stamford
    • Hartford
    • Trenton
    • Miami
    • Washington, DC
    • New York
    • Wilmington
    • Newark
  • Share

Share

Browse Alphabetically:

  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • E
  • F
  • G
  • H
  • I
  • J
  • K
  • L
  • M
  • N
  • O
  • P
  • Q
  • R
  • S
  • T
  • U
  • V
  • W
  • X
  • Y
  • Z
  • All
Bankruptcy, Restructuring & Litigation
Blockchain, Smart Contracts & Digital Currencies
Business Litigation
Cannabis
Coronavirus Resource Center
Corporate
Crisis Management
Cybersecurity & Data Privacy
Delaware Corporate, LLC & Partnership Law
Design, Fashion & Luxury
E-Discovery & Records Management
Energy & Utilities
Environment & Energy
Financial Institutions
Food & Beverage
Government Affairs
Government Contracts & Global Trade
Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
Healthcare
Hospitality
Immigration
Impact Investing
Insurance Recovery, Litigation & Counseling
Intellectual Property
Labor & Employment
Life Sciences
Manufacturing
Products Liability, Mass Torts & Consumer Class Actions
Public Finance
Real Estate
Renewable Energy
Sports & Entertainment
Tax & Employee Benefits
Technology Transactions
Transportation, Logistics & Supply Chain Management
Trusts, Estates & Private Clients
Venture Capital & Emerging Growth Companies
  • Broadcasts
  • Events
  • News
  • Publications
  • View All Insights
Search By:
Insights Publication Magazine Pages
Main image for Patent Office Proposes Greater Certainty in IPR Claim Amendment Process
Publications|Alert

Patent Office Proposes Greater Certainty in IPR Claim Amendment Process

Intellectual Property Alert

10.23.2019

The Patent Office has proposed new rules that may help patent owners avoid invalidation by amending patent claims in inter partes reviews (IPRs). When IPRs first became available, patent owners criticized the Patent Office because their right to amend claims in IPRs appeared to be illusory. Motions to amend have been filed in only about 10% of IPRs, and only about 10% of motions considered on the merits have been granted. The criticism and low success rate may have stemmed from a general misunderstanding as to the burdens for such motions. The Patent Office has responded with efforts to clarify and improve the amendment standards and process. 

Under the proposed rules, a patent owner seeking to amend claims in an IPR would bear an initial burden to show that the proposed amended claims are firmly based on the patent’s disclosure and would not broaden the scope of the original claims. The challenger would then bear the burden to show that the proposed amended claims are unpatentable. But regardless of the parties’ showings, the Patent Office could exercise discretion to grant or deny the motion “for any reason supported by the evidence of record.”  

The Patent Office discretion is intended to address the possibility that challengers may not care to satisfy their burden in an IPR as to proposed amended claims. For example, challengers may have withdrawn from the IPR, may have settled their dispute with the patent owner, may be uninterested in proposed amended claims that would not impact their business, or may believe that intervening rights as to amended claims would protect their business. 

Patent owners must still weigh the benefits and risks of amending claims. For example, when an amendment changes the scope of the original claims, intervening rights may limit enforcement of the amended claims. On the other hand, an amended claim may be more difficult for an infringer to invalidate. 

With its proposed new rules, the Patent Office continues to encourage motions to amend claims. The existing guidance and pilot program are designed to encourage such motions and to maximize their likelihood of success. The Patent Office’s proposed new rules would make the process for amending claims in an IPR more reliable and readily understandable. 

sidebar

pdfemail

Related People

Media item: Kia L. Freeman
Kia L. Freeman

Partner

Media item: Thomas F. Foley
Thomas F. Foley

Associate

Related Services

Intellectual Property
Post-Grant Proceedings
Subscribe to our Insights
McCarter & English, LLP
Copyright © 2023 McCarter & English, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
  • Login
  • Attorney Advertising
  • Privacy
  • Awards Methodology
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Sitemap

The McCarter & English, LLP website is for informational purposes only. We do not provide legal advice on this website. We can provide legal advice only to our clients in specific inquiries that they address to us. If you are interested in becoming a client, please contact us, but do not send any information about your specific legal question. We cannot serve as your lawyers until we establish an attorney-client relationship, which can occur only after we follow procedures within our firm and after we agree to the terms of the representation.

Accept Cancel