• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

McCarter & English Logo

  • People
  • Services
  • Insights
  • Our Firm
    • Leadership Team
    • Social Justice
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
    • Pro Bono
    • Client Service Values
    • Alumni
  • Join Us
    • Lawyers
    • Summer Associates
    • Patent Professionals
    • Professional Staff
    • Job Openings
  • Locations
    • Boston
    • Philadelphia
    • East Brunswick
    • Indianapolis
    • Stamford
    • Hartford
    • Trenton
    • Miami
    • Washington, DC
    • New York
    • Wilmington
    • Newark
  • Share

Share

Browse Alphabetically:

  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • E
  • F
  • G
  • H
  • I
  • J
  • K
  • L
  • M
  • N
  • O
  • P
  • Q
  • R
  • S
  • T
  • U
  • V
  • W
  • X
  • Y
  • Z
  • All
Bankruptcy, Restructuring & Litigation
Blockchain, Smart Contracts & Digital Currencies
Business Litigation
Cannabis
Coronavirus Resource Center
Corporate
Crisis Management
Cybersecurity & Data Privacy
Delaware Corporate, LLC & Partnership Law
Design, Fashion & Luxury
E-Discovery & Records Management
Energy & Utilities
Environment & Energy
Financial Institutions
Food & Beverage
Government Affairs
Government Contracts & Global Trade
Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
Healthcare
Hospitality
Immigration
Impact Investing
Insurance Recovery, Litigation & Counseling
Intellectual Property
Labor & Employment
Life Sciences
Manufacturing
Products Liability, Mass Torts & Consumer Class Actions
Public Finance
Real Estate
Renewable Energy
Sports & Entertainment
Tax & Employee Benefits
Technology Transactions
Transportation, Logistics & Supply Chain Management
Trusts, Estates & Private Clients
Venture Capital & Emerging Growth Companies
  • Broadcasts
  • Events
  • News
  • Publications
  • View All Insights
Search By:
Insights News Newspaper Stack
Main image for Justices’ Expired-Patent Royalties Ban to Spur Clever Deals
News|Quote

Justices’ Expired-Patent Royalties Ban to Spur Clever Deals

Law360

6.22.2015

The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision Monday to leave intact a 50-year-old rule barring royalty agreements that continue after a patent expires means that companies interested in striking long-running licensing deals will have to find creative ways to structure them to get around the rule, attorneys say.

In a 6-3 decision in a case involving an expired Spider-Man toy patent, the justices ruled that they were bound by stare decisis not to overturn the ban, which was established in 1964 in Brulotte v. Thys Co.

Justice Elena Kagan wrote for the majority that inventor Stephen Kimble, who challenged the rule in a dispute with Spider-Man rights holder Marvel Enterprises Inc., had not shown a compelling reason to end the ban. However, she noted that “parties can often find ways around Brulotte,” allowing them to achieve the same goal of crafting licenses that last longer than the patent.

Those techniques, including spreading payments over a longer period of time or licensing other intellectual property along with a patent, have been used for years but will now be front and center in licensing negotiations, attorneys say.

Since trade secrets and trademarks do not expire like patents do, agreements that include those types of intellectual property with a “step down” in the royalty rate after the patent expires have long been a popular way to deal with Brulotte.

“If you pick up 100 license agreements that have a post-patent-term royalty in it, 95 percent would have a step down,” said Basam Nabulsi of McCarter & English LLP. “That’s the most common way to do it, and it will continue to be the most common way to do it.”

If Brulotte had been overturned, parties would have had much greater leeway to structure licensing agreements in ways that might make business sense for them but didn’t fall within the categories the Supreme Court said were allowed under the rule, Nabulsi said.

“There are creative ways to work around it, but changing the rule would have made it easier and would have been more in keeping with commercial realities,” he said.

However, attorneys pointed out that Congress is now deep into consideration of a wide-ranging patent bill, and it would be relatively easy to insert language overruling Brulotte if lawmakers were so inclined.

“Congress has shown a lot of interest in patent issues in recent years, so I don’t think it’s inconceivable that Congress can be persuaded that this is worth their time, especially since the majority and the dissent both say that the economic analysis presented by Kimble is viable,” Nabulsi said.

sidebar

pdfemail

Related People

Media item: Basam E. Nabulsi
Basam E. Nabulsi

Partner

Related Services

Intellectual Property
Patents
Subscribe to our Insights
McCarter & English, LLP
Copyright © 2023 McCarter & English, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
  • Login
  • Attorney Advertising
  • Privacy
  • Awards Methodology
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Sitemap

The McCarter & English, LLP website is for informational purposes only. We do not provide legal advice on this website. We can provide legal advice only to our clients in specific inquiries that they address to us. If you are interested in becoming a client, please contact us, but do not send any information about your specific legal question. We cannot serve as your lawyers until we establish an attorney-client relationship, which can occur only after we follow procedures within our firm and after we agree to the terms of the representation.

Accept Cancel