• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

McCarter & English Logo

  • People
  • Services
  • Insights
  • Our Firm
    • Leadership Team
    • Social Justice
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
    • Pro Bono
    • Client Service Values
    • Alumni
  • Join Us
    • Lawyers
    • Summer Associates
    • Patent Professionals
    • Professional Staff
    • Job Openings
  • Locations
    • Boston
    • Philadelphia
    • East Brunswick
    • Indianapolis
    • Stamford
    • Hartford
    • Trenton
    • Miami
    • Washington, DC
    • New York
    • Wilmington
    • Newark
  • Share

Share

Browse Alphabetically:

  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • E
  • F
  • G
  • H
  • I
  • J
  • K
  • L
  • M
  • N
  • O
  • P
  • Q
  • R
  • S
  • T
  • U
  • V
  • W
  • X
  • Y
  • Z
  • All
Bankruptcy, Restructuring & Litigation
Blockchain, Smart Contracts & Digital Currencies
Business Litigation
Cannabis
Coronavirus Resource Center
Corporate
Crisis Management
Cybersecurity & Data Privacy
Delaware Corporate, LLC & Partnership Law
Design, Fashion & Luxury
E-Discovery & Records Management
Energy & Utilities
Environment & Energy
Financial Institutions
Food & Beverage
Government Affairs
Government Contracts & Global Trade
Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
Healthcare
Hospitality
Immigration
Impact Investing
Insurance Recovery, Litigation & Counseling
Intellectual Property
Labor & Employment
Life Sciences
Manufacturing
Products Liability, Mass Torts & Consumer Class Actions
Public Finance
Real Estate
Renewable Energy
Sports & Entertainment
Tax & Employee Benefits
Technology Transactions
Transportation, Logistics & Supply Chain Management
Trusts, Estates & Private Clients
Venture Capital & Emerging Growth Companies
  • Broadcasts
  • Events
  • News
  • Publications
  • View All Insights
Search By:
Insights Publication Magazine Open Stack
Main image for Delaware Court of Chancery Favors the Plaintiff in Finding the Defendants’ Understanding of an LLC Agreement Not the Only Reasonable Interpretation
Publications|Alert

Delaware Court of Chancery Favors the Plaintiff in Finding the Defendants’ Understanding of an LLC Agreement Not the Only Reasonable Interpretation

Delaware Law Update

6.17.2019

Delaware Law Update—Delaware Court of Chancery Favors the Plaintiff in Finding the Defendants’ Understanding of an LLC Agreement Not the Only Reasonable Interpretation | Publications | McCarter & English

Coyne v. Fusion Healthworks, LLC, et al., C.A. No. 2018-0011-MTZ (Del. Ch. Apr. 30, 2019), Zurn, V.C.

The Delaware Court of Chancery denied defendants’ attempt to dismiss a lawsuit filed on behalf of a widow concerning the interest of her deceased husband’s estate in the assets of a Delaware limited liability company. The court found that defendants’ interpretation of certain provisions of the formation agreement was not the only reasonable interpretation, and thus, the widow’s claims survive. 

Case Background

This dispute concerned the dissolution of a Delaware limited liability company and competing interests in the proceeds of a life insurance policy obtained by the company to purchase a deceased member’s ownership interest. The relevant portions of the LLC agreement provided that a member’s personal bankruptcy would result in the member’s involuntary withdrawal from the company. Upon the member’s involuntary withdrawal, the company would dissolve unless a majority of the remaining members voted to continue the company. The dissolution of the company was critical to the continuation of the life insurance policy, in which the company’s dissolution would trigger the termination of the buy-sell agreement that provided for the purchase and preservation of the life insurance policy.

In this instance, one member filed for bankruptcy purportedly unbeknownst to the other members. Despite the bankruptcy filing, the remaining members failed to conduct a vote and the bankrupt member continued to participate in the management of the company. Thereafter, the bankrupt member, along with one other member, adopted a dissolution plan by written consent, engaged an accounting firm to value the company, ratified the accounting firm’s valuation by written consent, and authorized the filing of a certificate of cancellation. The third member filed a declaratory judgment action against the two members, but took his own life during the course of the litigation. The company received the proceeds from the insurance policy covering the deceased member, but failed to remit the proceeds to his estate.

The widow of the deceased member filed a separate lawsuit, in which she sought a declaratory judgment that the buy-sell agreement (1) did not terminate prior to her husband’s death and (2) it was enforceable by the parties.

Court of Chancery Decision

In response to defendants’ motion to dismiss, the court ruled that the plaintiff adequately plead a claim for declaratory relief. The result was predicated on the finding that the buy-sell agreement implicitly incorporated the LLC agreement, in which the buy-sell agreement terminated upon the company’s dissolution. The defendants argued that upon the insolvent member becoming a withdrawn member, the majority of the remaining members were required to vote in favor of continuing the business to preserve the company. Since the remaining members did not undertake a vote, the defendants insisted that the company was automatically dissolved. The plaintiff maintained that an election was a prerequisite to the dissolution of the company; in the absence of a vote, the company could not dissolve. The court found both interpretations reasonable, but defendants’ position produced an “absurd result,” while plaintiff’s “interpretation better harmonize[d]” different sections of the LLC agreement. In light of the legal standard requiring the court to make all reasonable inferences in favor of the non-moving party, the court found that it was conceivable for the buy-sell agreement to survive the member’s bankruptcy filing.

Key Takeaways

The court’s ruling reflects an application of traditional contract principles. Having found that the dissolution provision of the LLC agreement was ambiguous, the court analyzed the parties’ respective positions in the context of other provisions concerning the management of the company. Viewing the pleadings in a light most favorable to plaintiff, the court concluded that the parties’ competing interpretations were reasonable, and thus, plaintiff sufficiently plead its claims to defeat the motion to dismiss. Although defendants’ interpretation may carry the day in the end, the pro se plaintiff plead sufficient facts to preserve the estate’s claim to the life insurance proceeds.

sidebar

pdfemail

Related People

Media item: Matthew J. Rifino
Matthew J. Rifino

Special Counsel

Related Services

Delaware Corporate, LLC & Partnership Law
Corporate
Subscribe to our Insights
McCarter & English, LLP
Copyright © 2023 McCarter & English, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
  • Login
  • Attorney Advertising
  • Privacy
  • Awards Methodology
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Sitemap

The McCarter & English, LLP website is for informational purposes only. We do not provide legal advice on this website. We can provide legal advice only to our clients in specific inquiries that they address to us. If you are interested in becoming a client, please contact us, but do not send any information about your specific legal question. We cannot serve as your lawyers until we establish an attorney-client relationship, which can occur only after we follow procedures within our firm and after we agree to the terms of the representation.

Accept Cancel