• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

McCarter & English Logo

  • People
  • Services
  • Insights
  • Our Firm
    • Leadership Team
    • Social Justice
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
    • Pro Bono
    • Client Service Values
    • Alumni
  • Join Us
    • Lawyers
    • Summer Associates
    • Patent Professionals
    • Professional Staff
    • Job Openings
  • Locations
    • Boston
    • Philadelphia
    • East Brunswick
    • Indianapolis
    • Stamford
    • Hartford
    • Trenton
    • Miami
    • Washington, DC
    • New York
    • Wilmington
    • Newark
  • Share

Share

Browse Alphabetically:

  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • E
  • F
  • G
  • H
  • I
  • J
  • K
  • L
  • M
  • N
  • O
  • P
  • Q
  • R
  • S
  • T
  • U
  • V
  • W
  • X
  • Y
  • Z
  • All
Bankruptcy, Restructuring & Litigation
Blockchain, Smart Contracts & Digital Currencies
Business Litigation
Cannabis
Coronavirus Resource Center
Corporate
Crisis Management
Cybersecurity & Data Privacy
Delaware Corporate, LLC & Partnership Law
Design, Fashion & Luxury
E-Discovery & Records Management
Energy & Utilities
Environment & Energy
Financial Institutions
Food & Beverage
Government Affairs
Government Contracts & Global Trade
Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
Healthcare
Hospitality
Immigration
Impact Investing
Insurance Recovery, Litigation & Counseling
Intellectual Property
Labor & Employment
Life Sciences
Manufacturing
Products Liability, Mass Torts & Consumer Class Actions
Public Finance
Real Estate
Renewable Energy
Sports & Entertainment
Tax & Employee Benefits
Technology Transactions
Transportation, Logistics & Supply Chain Management
Trusts, Estates & Private Clients
Venture Capital & Emerging Growth Companies
  • Broadcasts
  • Events
  • News
  • Publications
  • View All Insights
Search By:
Insights News Newspaper Stack
Main image for Fraud Case Against Wilmington Trust Remains Largely Intact
News|Quote

Fraud Case Against Wilmington Trust Remains Largely Intact

Law360

7.7.2019

Motions to dismiss fraud charges against Wilmington Trust Corp. and four of its former executives were largely defeated Thursday when a Delaware federal judge said the federal government adequately pled its allegations in a second superseding indictment filed in January.

During a hearing in Wilmington, U.S. District Court Judge Richard G. Andrews determined that most of the charges filed against Wilmington Trust and former executives David Gibson, Robert Harra, William North and Kevyn Rakowski contained enough information to survive the motions to dismiss.

“I believe the defendants’ motions are requesting more than is required to be in the indictments,” Judge Andrews ruled from the bench in denying the requests to dismiss charges of securities fraud, false statements on reports to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, false entries in banking records and false certification of financial reports.

The indictment stems from the alleged masking of hundreds of millions of dollars in overdue loans by Wilmington Trust in the midst of the global financial crisis. The U.S. alleges the fraud was committed in an effort to attract investors and new customers to its lending services.

“We’re talking about loans that were in the process of extension,” Michael Kelly of McCarter & English LLP, representing former President and Chief Operating Officer Robert Harra, said. “At what point do you cut off the process?”

Read More

sidebar

pdfemail

Related People

Media item: Michael P. Kelly
Michael P. Kelly

In Memoriam

Related Services

Business Litigation
Subscribe to our Insights
McCarter & English, LLP
Copyright © 2023 McCarter & English, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
  • Login
  • Attorney Advertising
  • Privacy
  • Awards Methodology
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Sitemap

The McCarter & English, LLP website is for informational purposes only. We do not provide legal advice on this website. We can provide legal advice only to our clients in specific inquiries that they address to us. If you are interested in becoming a client, please contact us, but do not send any information about your specific legal question. We cannot serve as your lawyers until we establish an attorney-client relationship, which can occur only after we follow procedures within our firm and after we agree to the terms of the representation.

Accept Cancel