• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

McCarter & English Logo

  • People
  • Services
  • Insights
  • Our Firm
    • Leadership Team
    • Social Justice
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
    • Pro Bono
    • Client Service Values
    • Alumni
  • Join Us
    • Lawyers
    • Summer Associates
    • Patent Professionals
    • Professional Staff
    • Job Openings
  • Locations
    • Boston
    • Philadelphia
    • East Brunswick
    • Indianapolis
    • Stamford
    • Hartford
    • Trenton
    • Miami
    • Washington, DC
    • New York
    • Wilmington
    • Newark
  • Share

Share

Browse Alphabetically:

  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • E
  • F
  • G
  • H
  • I
  • J
  • K
  • L
  • M
  • N
  • O
  • P
  • Q
  • R
  • S
  • T
  • U
  • V
  • W
  • X
  • Y
  • Z
  • All
Bankruptcy, Restructuring & Litigation
Blockchain, Smart Contracts & Digital Currencies
Business Litigation
Cannabis
Coronavirus Resource Center
Corporate
Crisis Management
Cybersecurity & Data Privacy
Delaware Corporate, LLC & Partnership Law
Design, Fashion & Luxury
E-Discovery & Records Management
Energy & Utilities
Environment & Energy
Financial Institutions
Food & Beverage
Government Affairs
Government Contracts & Global Trade
Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
Healthcare
Hospitality
Immigration
Impact Investing
Insurance Recovery, Litigation & Counseling
Intellectual Property
Labor & Employment
Life Sciences
Manufacturing
Products Liability, Mass Torts & Consumer Class Actions
Public Finance
Real Estate
Renewable Energy
Sports & Entertainment
Tax & Employee Benefits
Technology Transactions
Transportation, Logistics & Supply Chain Management
Trusts, Estates & Private Clients
Venture Capital & Emerging Growth Companies
  • Broadcasts
  • Events
  • News
  • Publications
  • View All Insights
Search By:
Insights Publication Magazine Corner
Main image for Motor Carriers Granted Temporary Relief by California Federal Court from Stringent Independent Contractor Classifications
Publications|Alert

Motor Carriers Granted Temporary Relief by California Federal Court from Stringent Independent Contractor Classifications

Transportation, Logistics & Supply Chain Management Alert

1.3.2020

Good news for the motor carrier industry … for now. A federal judge has issued a temporary restraining order that prevents the state of California from enforcing a strict independent contractor misclassification law against motor carriers—that was set to take effect on January 1—until the court resolves a lawsuit challenging the law brought by the California Trucking Association (CTA).  

Assembly Bill 5 (AB 5) establishes that the work of owner-operators must pass a three-pronged test, commonly called the ABC test, to allow employers to designate them as independent contractors rather than employees. The law will have a profound impact on the motor carrier industry and, CTA alleged in its suit, will make it “impracticable if not impossible for CTA’s motor-carrier members to provide interstate trucking services by contracting with independent owner-operators.” On December 24, CTA filed a motion for a TRO seeking to delay the law’s implementation until the resolution of its previous motion for a preliminary injunction. 

Judge Roger T. Benitez of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California found that CTA had met its burden to obtain the emergency relief requested by showing “(1) they are likely to succeed on the merits, (2) likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of relief, (3) the balance of equities tips in their favor and (4) that their requested relief is in the public interest.”

At particular issue in the case is Prong B of the ABC test, which states that a person is an employee unless they “perform work outside of the usual course of the hiring entity’s business.” The court found that this likely is preempted by the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act, which, in pertinent part, prohibits any state from “enact[ing] or enforce[ing] a law, regulation or other provision having force and effect of law related to price, route or service of any motor carrier…with respect to the transportation of property”—effectively stating that AB 5 “mandates that motor carriers treat owner operators as employees, rather than as the independent contractors that they are.” Judge Benitez, in further clarifying his position, found that motor carriers, in essence, could never satisfy Prong B, as drivers perform services in the usual course of a motor carrier’s business.  

While the TRO is a good sign for the motor carrier industry, there may be twists and turns in the road ahead. The next hearing on the case is slated for January 13.    

California Trucking Association, et al., v. Attorney General Xavier Becerra, et al. 

sidebar

pdfemail

Related People

Media item: Ronald M. Leibman
Ronald M. Leibman

Partner

Related Services

Transportation, Logistics & Supply Chain Management
Subscribe to our Insights
McCarter & English, LLP
Copyright © 2023 McCarter & English, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
  • Login
  • Attorney Advertising
  • Privacy
  • Awards Methodology
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Sitemap

The McCarter & English, LLP website is for informational purposes only. We do not provide legal advice on this website. We can provide legal advice only to our clients in specific inquiries that they address to us. If you are interested in becoming a client, please contact us, but do not send any information about your specific legal question. We cannot serve as your lawyers until we establish an attorney-client relationship, which can occur only after we follow procedures within our firm and after we agree to the terms of the representation.

Accept Cancel