• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

McCarter & English Logo

  • People
  • Services
  • Insights
  • Our Firm
    • Leadership Team
    • Social Justice
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
    • Pro Bono
    • Client Service Values
    • Alumni
  • Join Us
    • Lawyers
    • Summer Associates
    • Patent Professionals
    • Professional Staff
    • Job Openings
  • Locations
    • Boston
    • Philadelphia
    • East Brunswick
    • Indianapolis
    • Stamford
    • Hartford
    • Trenton
    • Miami
    • Washington, DC
    • New York
    • Wilmington
    • Newark
  • Share

Share

Browse Alphabetically:

  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • E
  • F
  • G
  • H
  • I
  • J
  • K
  • L
  • M
  • N
  • O
  • P
  • Q
  • R
  • S
  • T
  • U
  • V
  • W
  • X
  • Y
  • Z
  • All
Bankruptcy, Restructuring & Litigation
Blockchain, Smart Contracts & Digital Currencies
Business Litigation
Cannabis
Coronavirus Resource Center
Corporate
Crisis Management
Cybersecurity & Data Privacy
Delaware Corporate, LLC & Partnership Law
Design, Fashion & Luxury
E-Discovery & Records Management
Energy & Utilities
Environment & Energy
Financial Institutions
Food & Beverage
Government Affairs
Government Contracts & Global Trade
Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
Healthcare
Hospitality
Immigration
Impact Investing
Insurance Recovery, Litigation & Counseling
Intellectual Property
Labor & Employment
Life Sciences
Manufacturing
Products Liability, Mass Torts & Consumer Class Actions
Public Finance
Real Estate
Renewable Energy
Sports & Entertainment
Tax & Employee Benefits
Technology Transactions
Transportation, Logistics & Supply Chain Management
Trusts, Estates & Private Clients
Venture Capital & Emerging Growth Companies
  • Broadcasts
  • Events
  • News
  • Publications
  • View All Insights
Search By:
Insights News Contracts Stack
Main image for 9th Circ.’s ‘Dancing Baby’ Ruling Came with Big Caveats
News|Quote

9th Circ.’s ‘Dancing Baby’ Ruling Came with Big Caveats

Law360

9.14.2015

The Ninth Circuit’s long-awaited ruling in the so-called “dancing baby” case was a victory for the fair use doctrine and for critics of aggressive online copyright enforcement, but one that was also carefully limited to avoid the kind of sweeping decision some wanted.

Stephanie Lenz sued Universal Music Group in 2007, claiming the label violated the Digital Millennium Copyright Act’s takedown procedures by improperly asking YouTube to yank a 30-second clip of her son dancing to Prince’s “Let’s Go Crazy,” a video she said was protected under the fair use doctrine.

As the case made its way toward a Ninth Circuit decision after more than eight years of litigation, many viewed Lenz’s fight as a key battle in the broader, never-ending legal and policy war over how copyrights can and should be protected on the Internet.

In a broad sense, the Ninth Circuit’s decision for Lenz was a sweeping endorsement of the fair use doctrine’s place in American copyright law.

In finding that copyright owners need to consider the doctrine before sending notices, the appeals court ruled that fair use of copyrighted material is not some kind of exception to the law or merely a way to excuse otherwise infringing activity, but rather is “wholly authorized” by the law.

That distinction matters: Fair use is not some kind of loophole in protection, the court said, but a positive right.

“The court really embraced the fair use mantra and seemed to highlight it as a noble and welcome defense to copyright infringement that merits heightened scrutiny,” said Scott Christie, a partner at McCarter & English LLP. “The court said that because society benefits from fair use activity, copyright owners need to be better schooled in it, and they need to make sure they’re not stifling it.”

sidebar

pdfemail

Related People

Media item: Scott S. Christie
Scott S. Christie

Partner

Related Services

Intellectual Property
Trademarks & Copyrights
Subscribe to our Insights
McCarter & English, LLP
Copyright © 2023 McCarter & English, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
  • Login
  • Attorney Advertising
  • Privacy
  • Awards Methodology
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Sitemap

The McCarter & English, LLP website is for informational purposes only. We do not provide legal advice on this website. We can provide legal advice only to our clients in specific inquiries that they address to us. If you are interested in becoming a client, please contact us, but do not send any information about your specific legal question. We cannot serve as your lawyers until we establish an attorney-client relationship, which can occur only after we follow procedures within our firm and after we agree to the terms of the representation.

Accept Cancel