• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

McCarter & English Logo

  • People
  • Services
  • Insights
  • Our Firm
    • Leadership Team
    • Social Justice
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
    • Pro Bono
    • Client Service Values
    • Alumni
  • Join Us
    • Lawyers
    • Summer Associates
    • Patent Professionals
    • Professional Staff
    • Job Openings
  • Locations
    • Boston
    • Philadelphia
    • East Brunswick
    • Indianapolis
    • Stamford
    • Hartford
    • Trenton
    • Miami
    • Washington, DC
    • New York
    • Wilmington
    • Newark
  • Share

Share

Browse Alphabetically:

  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • E
  • F
  • G
  • H
  • I
  • J
  • K
  • L
  • M
  • N
  • O
  • P
  • Q
  • R
  • S
  • T
  • U
  • V
  • W
  • X
  • Y
  • Z
  • All
Bankruptcy, Restructuring & Litigation
Blockchain, Smart Contracts & Digital Currencies
Business Litigation
Cannabis
Coronavirus Resource Center
Corporate
Crisis Management
Cybersecurity & Data Privacy
Delaware Corporate, LLC & Partnership Law
Design, Fashion & Luxury
E-Discovery & Records Management
Energy & Utilities
Environment & Energy
Financial Institutions
Food & Beverage
Government Affairs
Government Contracts & Global Trade
Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
Healthcare
Hospitality
Immigration
Impact Investing
Insurance Recovery, Litigation & Counseling
Intellectual Property
Labor & Employment
Life Sciences
Manufacturing
Products Liability, Mass Torts & Consumer Class Actions
Public Finance
Real Estate
Renewable Energy
Sports & Entertainment
Tax & Employee Benefits
Technology Transactions
Transportation, Logistics & Supply Chain Management
Trusts, Estates & Private Clients
Venture Capital & Emerging Growth Companies
  • Broadcasts
  • Events
  • News
  • Publications
  • View All Insights
Search By:
Insights News Newspaper Stack
Main image for SCOTUS Declines to Address Circuit Split on FCA “Objective Falsity,” Which May Spur Settlements
News|Quote

SCOTUS Declines to Address Circuit Split on FCA “Objective Falsity,” Which May Spur Settlements

Law360

2.23.2021

The US Supreme Court’s refusal to tackle whether False Claims Act liability requires a claim to be objectively false leaves a significant circuit split and may drive an uptick in FCA settlements as defendants consider the costs of extended litigation.

For FCA defendants in circuits that have either rejected or have yet to squarely address the objective falsity standard, the continued potential for liability to hinge on differences of opinion will be a prominent factor in how they design their litigation strategy, said Matthew Wright, a partner at McCarter & English LLP. Companies and other defendants could end up settling disputes early and for potentially larger amounts than they would have previously, for the sake of certainty.

“Obviously … individual defendants [decide] how they weigh exposure and risk,” he said. “But the hanging question of whether or not an objectively false statement is a necessary element [of liability], if that’s not resolved cleanly, definitely weights risk, or tilts risk, against the defendant.”

Another important factor in deciding whether to defend or settle an FCA case, particularly with the prospect of a judgment on the merits, is the hefty maximum for potential penalties: triple the government’s damages and more than $23,000 per invoice in civil penalties.

“The consequences that flow from a False Claims Act suit, whether brought by a relator or joined by the government — you’re talking about massive penalties, treble damages, really significant exposures for any federal contractor,” Wright said.

more information (subscription required)

sidebar

pdfemail

Related People

Media item: Matthew Wright
Matthew Wright

Partner

Related Services

Business Litigation
Government Contracts & Global Trade
False Claims Act
Subscribe to our Insights
McCarter & English, LLP
Copyright © 2023 McCarter & English, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
  • Login
  • Attorney Advertising
  • Privacy
  • Awards Methodology
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Sitemap

The McCarter & English, LLP website is for informational purposes only. We do not provide legal advice on this website. We can provide legal advice only to our clients in specific inquiries that they address to us. If you are interested in becoming a client, please contact us, but do not send any information about your specific legal question. We cannot serve as your lawyers until we establish an attorney-client relationship, which can occur only after we follow procedures within our firm and after we agree to the terms of the representation.

Accept Cancel