• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

McCarter & English Logo

  • People
  • Services
  • Insights
  • Our Firm
    • Leadership Team
    • Social Justice
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
    • Pro Bono
    • Client Service Values
    • Alumni
  • Join Us
    • Lawyers
    • Summer Associates
    • Patent Professionals
    • Professional Staff
    • Job Openings
  • Locations
    • Boston
    • Philadelphia
    • East Brunswick
    • Indianapolis
    • Stamford
    • Hartford
    • Trenton
    • Miami
    • Washington, DC
    • New York
    • Wilmington
    • Newark
  • Share

Share

Browse Alphabetically:

  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • E
  • F
  • G
  • H
  • I
  • J
  • K
  • L
  • M
  • N
  • O
  • P
  • Q
  • R
  • S
  • T
  • U
  • V
  • W
  • X
  • Y
  • Z
  • All
Bankruptcy, Restructuring & Litigation
Blockchain, Smart Contracts & Digital Currencies
Business Litigation
Cannabis
Coronavirus Resource Center
Corporate
Crisis Management
Cybersecurity & Data Privacy
Delaware Corporate, LLC & Partnership Law
Design, Fashion & Luxury
E-Discovery & Records Management
Energy & Utilities
Environment & Energy
Financial Institutions
Food & Beverage
Government Affairs
Government Contracts & Global Trade
Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
Healthcare
Hospitality
Immigration
Impact Investing
Insurance Recovery, Litigation & Counseling
Intellectual Property
Labor & Employment
Life Sciences
Manufacturing
Products Liability, Mass Torts & Consumer Class Actions
Public Finance
Real Estate
Renewable Energy
Sports & Entertainment
Tax & Employee Benefits
Technology Transactions
Transportation, Logistics & Supply Chain Management
Trusts, Estates & Private Clients
Venture Capital & Emerging Growth Companies
  • Broadcasts
  • Events
  • News
  • Publications
  • View All Insights
Search By:
DE Corporate Law
Main image for The Delaware Supreme Court Signals Deference to the Department of Finance on Unclaimed Property Audit Subpoenas
Publications|Alert

The Delaware Supreme Court Signals Deference to the Department of Finance on Unclaimed Property Audit Subpoenas

Unclaimed Property Alert

6.4.2021

A recent decision of the Delaware Supreme Court, State of Del., Dept. of Fin. v. AT&T, Inc., Case No. 303, 2020 (Del. June 1, 2021), Seitz, C.J., provides a framework for resolving disputes concerning administrative subpoenas that reflects great deference to administrative agencies such as the Delaware Department of Finance (DDF). In a case of first impression, the appellate court affirmed the trial court’s quashing of a DDF administrative subpoena served in furtherance of an unclaimed property audit, but remanded the proceeding to the Court of Chancery to allow the DDF to issue a new subpoena consistent with its opinion and, if appropriate, file an amended complaint. In doing so, the Delaware Supreme Court provided the Court of Chancery with guidance for resolving administrative subpoena disputes should the DDF amend its complaint and issue a new subpoena by offering a standard favorable to administrative agencies.

Delaware’s highly-lucrative unclaimed property program has been the subject of extensive litigation in recent years. Generally speaking, unclaimed property disputes arise out of the escheat of property to the State when the lawful owner of the property has not made use of or exercised control over the property within a specified period of time. The obligation of a holder of unclaimed property to maintain accurate records is onerous, and the sufficiency of the holder’s recordkeeping is the principal area of dispute between DDF and the holder community. Delaware law authorizes DDF to serve an administrative subpoena in order to assess a holder’s unclaimed property liability.

The standard offered in AT&T for determining enforceability of these administrative subpoenas is similar to the framework followed in the federal courts but requires that a recipient of an administrative subpoena raise its affirmative defenses in its initial pleading by affidavit. Consequently, a defendant must make a detailed showing of its opposition at the outset of the enforcement action and without the benefit of discovery. Although a recipient of an administrative subpoena retains its ability to contest an administrative subpoena, it faces an uphill battle to combat an administrative agency’s demands for information. The deferential framework established by the Delaware Supreme Court could lead to an increased use of administrative subpoenas. Given the importance of unclaimed property to the State of Delaware, the AT&T decision may embolden the DDF to pursue an administrative subpoena, as opposed to negotiating with holders of unclaimed property, which may, in turn, lead to an increase in litigation.

sidebar

pdfemail

Related People

Media item: Matthew J. Rifino
Matthew J. Rifino

Special Counsel

Related Services

Bankruptcy, Restructuring & Litigation
Delaware Corporate, LLC & Partnership Law
Subscribe to our Insights
McCarter & English, LLP
Copyright © 2023 McCarter & English, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
  • Login
  • Attorney Advertising
  • Privacy
  • Awards Methodology
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Sitemap

The McCarter & English, LLP website is for informational purposes only. We do not provide legal advice on this website. We can provide legal advice only to our clients in specific inquiries that they address to us. If you are interested in becoming a client, please contact us, but do not send any information about your specific legal question. We cannot serve as your lawyers until we establish an attorney-client relationship, which can occur only after we follow procedures within our firm and after we agree to the terms of the representation.

Accept Cancel