• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

McCarter & English Logo

  • People
  • Services
  • Insights
  • Our Firm
    • Leadership Team
    • Social Justice
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Pro Bono
    • Client Service Values
  • Join Us
    • Lawyers
    • Summer Associates
    • Patent Professionals
    • Professional Staff
    • Job Openings
  • Locations
    • Boston
    • Philadelphia
    • East Brunswick
    • Indianapolis
    • Stamford
    • Hartford
    • Trenton
    • Miami
    • Washington, DC
    • New York
    • Wilmington
    • Newark
  • Share

Share

Browse Alphabetically:

  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • E
  • F
  • G
  • H
  • I
  • J
  • K
  • L
  • M
  • N
  • O
  • P
  • Q
  • R
  • S
  • T
  • U
  • V
  • W
  • X
  • Y
  • Z
  • All
Bankruptcy, Restructuring & Litigation
Blockchain, Smart Contracts & Digital Currencies
Business Litigation
Cannabis
Coronavirus Resource Center
Corporate
Crisis Management
Cybersecurity & Data Privacy
Delaware Corporate, LLC & Partnership Law
Design, Fashion & Luxury
E-Discovery & Records Management
Energy & Utilities
Environment & Energy
Financial Institutions
Food & Beverage
Government Affairs
Government Contracts & Global Trade
Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
Healthcare
Immigration
Impact Investing
Insurance Recovery, Litigation & Counseling
Intellectual Property
Labor & Employment
Life Sciences
Manufacturing
Products Liability, Mass Torts & Consumer Class Actions
Public Finance
Real Estate
Renewable Energy
Sports & Entertainment
Tax & Employee Benefits
Technology Transactions
Transportation, Logistics & Supply Chain Management
Trusts, Estates & Private Clients
Venture Capital & Emerging Growth Companies
  • Broadcasts
  • Events
  • News
  • Publications
  • View All Insights
Search By:
Insights News Contract Stack
Main image for DOE Requests FERC Fast-Track a Rule That Will Benefit Coal and Nuclear Plants
Publications|Alert

DOE Requests FERC Fast-Track a Rule That Will Benefit Coal and Nuclear Plants

Environment & Energy Alert

10.10.2017

On September 28, 2017, the U.S. Department of Energy (“DOE”) took the unusual step of submitting a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“NOPR”) for consideration by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”), now docketed by FERC as RM18-1-000. The NOPR proposes to compensate certain generating resources in organized wholesale markets through out-of-market revenues for reliability, resiliency and fuel-assurance attributes. The proposed criteria for these subsidies would result in certain coal and nuclear resources being the beneficiaries. Depending on how the Regional Transmission Organizations (“RTOs”) and Independent System Operators (“ISOs”) that manage the organized wholesale markets would implement any directives stemming from a final rule, the NOPR could have a significant effect on how power is priced in those markets and could potentially drive up clearing prices and, in turn, consumer electricity bills.

DOE’s intent appears to be to provide nuclear and coal resources—in organized wholesale markets—with financial support over and above current market clearing prices. The NOPR proposes that each RTO/ISO would be required to propose market rules that provide eligible coal and nuclear plants physically located in RTO/ISO regions that are not subject to cost-of-service rate regulation by a state or local authority with full recovery of the costs associated with reliability, resiliency and on-site fuel assurance. The types of costs proposed for recovery include, but are not limited to, “operating and fuel expenses, costs of capital and debt, and a fair return on equity and investment.” The NOPR is short on details, proposing to leave the details of implementation to the RTOs/ISOs. Any estimate of the effect on consumers would depend on the approach taken by the RTOs/ISOs in implementing the directives. For example, if an RTO/ISO determined that its current capacity market design rules already comply with the NOPR proposal, the proposed rule could have little impact on consumers in that region. However, if the RTO/ISO developed a method for providing additional out-of-market compensation for such resources akin to a Reliability Must Run (“RMR”) contract, consumers could face significant increases in electricity prices. 

This NOPR raises numerous fundamental questions that will have to be addressed by FERC and the industry:

  • Would the proposed rule establish guaranteed price floors, and thus subsidies, for eligible coal and nuclear resources, while also allowing them to retain all the upsides of market prices when those prices exceed costs, leading to a “higher of market-based rates or cost” pricing regimen?

  • What effect would these out-of-market revenues have on the incentives for new market entry built into current market design?
     
  • How would the proposed rule be reconciled with FERC’s long-professed objective of facilitating competitive wholesale markets? 

  • How would attributes of reliability and resiliency to be rewarded by the NOPR be measured and valued? 

  • What would be a reasonable compensation level, if any, for the attributes to be compensated?

FERC Staff issued a set of queries to try to obtain answers to these and other questions.

FERC established an unusually short comment period, with an initial comment deadline of October 23, 2017, and reply comments due November 7, 2017. A number of entities requested an extension of time to 90 days for comments as well as an extension of time for FERC to consider comments. As of the issuance of this Alert, FERC had not ruled on these motions.

sidebar

pdfemail

Related People

Media item: Denise C. Goulet
Denise C. Goulet

Partner

Media item: Sean T. Beeny
Sean T. Beeny

Special Counsel

Related Services

Energy & Utilities
Environment & Energy
Subscribe to our Insights
McCarter & English, LLP
Copyright © 2022 McCarter & English, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
  • Login
  • Attorney Advertising
  • Privacy
  • Awards Methodology
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Sitemap

The McCarter & English, LLP website is for informational purposes only. We do not provide legal advice on this website. We can provide legal advice only to our clients in specific inquiries that they address to us. If you are interested in becoming a client, please contact us, but do not send any information about your specific legal question. We cannot serve as your lawyers until we establish an attorney-client relationship, which can occur only after we follow procedures within our firm and after we agree to the terms of the representation.

Accept Cancel