• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

McCarter & English Logo

  • People
  • Services
  • Insights
  • Our Firm
    • Leadership Team
    • Social Justice
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
    • Pro Bono
    • Client Service Values
    • Alumni
  • Join Us
    • Lawyers
    • Summer Associates
    • Patent Professionals
    • Professional Staff
    • Job Openings
  • Locations
    • Boston
    • Philadelphia
    • East Brunswick
    • Indianapolis
    • Stamford
    • Hartford
    • Trenton
    • Miami
    • Washington, DC
    • New York
    • Wilmington
    • Newark
  • Share

Share

Browse Alphabetically:

  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • E
  • F
  • G
  • H
  • I
  • J
  • K
  • L
  • M
  • N
  • O
  • P
  • Q
  • R
  • S
  • T
  • U
  • V
  • W
  • X
  • Y
  • Z
  • All
Bankruptcy, Restructuring & Litigation
Blockchain, Smart Contracts & Digital Currencies
Business Litigation
Cannabis
Coronavirus Resource Center
Corporate
Crisis Management
Cybersecurity & Data Privacy
Delaware Corporate, LLC & Partnership Law
Design, Fashion & Luxury
E-Discovery & Records Management
Energy & Utilities
Environment & Energy
Financial Institutions
Food & Beverage
Government Affairs
Government Contracts & Global Trade
Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
Healthcare
Hospitality
Immigration
Impact Investing
Insurance Recovery, Litigation & Counseling
Intellectual Property
Labor & Employment
Life Sciences
Manufacturing
Products Liability, Mass Torts & Consumer Class Actions
Public Finance
Real Estate
Renewable Energy
Sports & Entertainment
Tax & Employee Benefits
Technology Transactions
Transportation, Logistics & Supply Chain Management
Trusts, Estates & Private Clients
Venture Capital & Emerging Growth Companies
  • Broadcasts
  • Events
  • News
  • Publications
  • View All Insights
Search By:
Boardroom Corporate Service
Main image for SBA and Treasury Department Sued Over PPP Loan Guidance on the Good Faith Necessity Certification
Publications|Alert

SBA and Treasury Department Sued Over PPP Loan Guidance on the Good Faith Necessity Certification

Coronavirus Legal Advisory

5.9.2020

On May 4, 2020, three California-based technology firms—Zumasys Inc. and two of its subsidiaries (the “Tech Companies”)—filed suit in California federal court to block recent Small Business Administration (“SBA”) guidance in the form of Frequently Asked Questions (“FAQs”), which were issued after media outlets reported many publicly traded companies received millions in Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) loans. The FAQs are causing great uncertainty for businesses that have received PPP loans as they grapple with whether to return them. See Zumasys, Inc. et al v. United States Small Business Administration et al (8:20-cv-00851), California Central District Court, Filed: 05/04/2020.

The underlying dispute involves how to harmonize two distinct provisions of Section 1102 of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”), which established PPP as a new form of SBA 7(a) business loan (“SBA Business Loan”) to provide financial assistance to qualified businesses to pay their workforce during the COVID-19 pandemic. On the one hand, Section 1102(a)(2)(I) clearly eliminates the requirement for SBA Business Loans that “a small business concern [be] unable to obtain credit elsewhere” (emphasis added). “Credit elsewhere” is defined as “the availability of credit from non-Federal sources on reasonable terms and conditions taking into consideration the prevailing rates and terms…for similar purposes and periods of time” (Section 3(h) of the Small Business Act, 15 U.S. Code Section 632). On the other hand, Section 1102(a)(2)(G) requires a PPP loan applicant to in good faith certify that “the uncertainty of the current economic conditions makes necessary the loan request to support the ongoing operations of the [applicant]” (emphasis added) (the “Good Faith Necessity Certification”).

In an effort to “thread the needle” of these two somewhat conflicting provisions and address the public outcry over a number of large public companies receiving PPP loans, FAQ 31 states that in making the Good Faith Necessity Certification, applicants must take “into account their current business activity and their ability to access other sources of liquidity sufficient to support their ongoing operations in a manner that is not significantly detrimental to the business.” The FAQ goes on to state that it is unlikely that public companies with the ability to access public markets will be able to make the Good Faith Necessity Certification, and establishes a “safe harbor” allowing borrowers to repay PPP loan funds obtained based on a misunderstanding or misapplication of the required certification standard, which has now been extended to May 18. On April 28, the SBA issued FAQ 37, which makes clear that private companies must perform the same analysis in providing the Good Faith Necessity Certification.

The Tech Companies are seeking a court order that would bar the SBA and the Treasury Department from enforcing FAQ guidance found in questions #31 and #37 and have challenged the legality of the FAQs by further contending they:

  • Undermine the CARES Act, which provides that “an impacted borrower is presumed to have been adversely impacted by COVID-19”
  • Result in a bait and switch for employers who obtained PPP funds in order to retain their employees with the expectation of loan forgiveness, but now are pressured to repay the PPP funds with money they must borrow, putting employers in a worse position than if they had furloughed their employees in the first place
  • Exclude public companies from receiving PPP loans, making the FAQs adverse to the goal of keeping American workers employed

McCarter & English, LLP, will continue to monitor and report on cases that impact the availability of PPP proceeds and loan forgiveness.

While we await further SBA guidance on how it will review the Good Faith Necessity Certification during the loan forgiveness phase of PPP, which guidance the SBA intends to provide before May 14 (see FAQ 43), we believe it prudent for PPP loan recipients to carefully review and formally document the factors and circumstances facing their businesses since the onset of the pandemic in March 2020, including the effect of the pandemic on business operations, profitability, cash flow, pipeline, projections, and sources and uses of liquidity for the balance of the calendar year. In so demonstrating that its board fully evaluated the material information reasonably available and formed a reasonable basis for the Good Faith Necessity Certification, a borrower should be able to withstand any principled review by the SBA, in the same way that under the “business judgment rule,” courts will not second-guess an informed board which exercises its reasonable judgment in its decision making, even if its decision does not result in a favorable outcome for the company.

sidebar

pdfemail

Related People

Media item: Howard M. Berkower
Howard M. Berkower

Partner

Media item: William D. Brown, Jr.
William D. Brown, Jr.

Associate

Media item: Scott J. Seger
Scott J. Seger

Associate

Related Services

Coronavirus Resource Center
Corporate
Financial Institutions
Subscribe to our Insights
McCarter & English, LLP
Copyright © 2023 McCarter & English, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
  • Login
  • Attorney Advertising
  • Privacy
  • Awards Methodology
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Sitemap

The McCarter & English, LLP website is for informational purposes only. We do not provide legal advice on this website. We can provide legal advice only to our clients in specific inquiries that they address to us. If you are interested in becoming a client, please contact us, but do not send any information about your specific legal question. We cannot serve as your lawyers until we establish an attorney-client relationship, which can occur only after we follow procedures within our firm and after we agree to the terms of the representation.

Accept Cancel