• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

McCarter & English Logo

  • People
  • Services
  • Insights
  • Our Firm
    • Leadership Team
    • Social Justice
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
    • Pro Bono
    • Client Service Values
    • Alumni
  • Join Us
    • Lawyers
    • Summer Associates
    • Patent Professionals
    • Professional Staff
    • Job Openings
  • Locations
    • Boston
    • Philadelphia
    • East Brunswick
    • Indianapolis
    • Stamford
    • Hartford
    • Trenton
    • Miami
    • Washington, DC
    • New York
    • Wilmington
    • Newark
  • Share

Share

Browse Alphabetically:

  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • E
  • F
  • G
  • H
  • I
  • J
  • K
  • L
  • M
  • N
  • O
  • P
  • Q
  • R
  • S
  • T
  • U
  • V
  • W
  • X
  • Y
  • Z
  • All
Bankruptcy, Restructuring & Litigation
Blockchain, Smart Contracts & Digital Currencies
Business Litigation
Cannabis
Coronavirus Resource Center
Corporate
Crisis Management
Cybersecurity & Data Privacy
Delaware Corporate, LLC & Partnership Law
Design, Fashion & Luxury
E-Discovery & Records Management
Energy & Utilities
Environment & Energy
Financial Institutions
Food & Beverage
Government Affairs
Government Contracts & Global Trade
Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
Healthcare
Hospitality
Immigration
Impact Investing
Insurance Recovery, Litigation & Counseling
Intellectual Property
Labor & Employment
Life Sciences
Manufacturing
Products Liability, Mass Torts & Consumer Class Actions
Public Finance
Real Estate
Renewable Energy
Sports & Entertainment
Tax & Employee Benefits
Technology Transactions
Transportation, Logistics & Supply Chain Management
Trusts, Estates & Private Clients
Venture Capital & Emerging Growth Companies
  • Broadcasts
  • Events
  • News
  • Publications
  • View All Insights
Search By:
Media item displaying True Colors Shining Through: Update on Protection for Product Packaging
Main image for True Colors Shining Through: Update on Protection for Product Packaging
Publications|Alert

True Colors Shining Through: Update on Protection for Product Packaging

Intellectual Property Alert

5.21.2020

Brands have long struggled to protect product and packaging designs from competitors and copycats seeking to trade on their looks. But even after committing significant resources to creating a design that will resonate with the public, companies may find it hard to convince the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or a federal court that their packaging is worthy of trademark protection.

Protecting shapes and colors is particularly challenging because trademark law seeks to prevent monopolizing of common words, shapes, or colors. But the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which oversees the USPTO, may have opened a narrow window for consumer brands. The Federal Circuit has reversed the USPTO’s refusal to register the following multicolor mark, owned by Forney Industries and used on packaging for welding and machining products. 

Before the Federal Circuit’s clarification of the law, the USPTO had operated under the presumption that (1) product packaging and color marks are not inherently distinctive and (2) one seeking protection must show that the packaging or color configuration had become distinctive in the minds of consumers through years of exclusive use, promotion, commercial success, or other indicators. The second prong of this test is often referred to as “secondary meaning” or “acquired distinctiveness.” Even well-known packaging designs like the iconic Coke bottle or the turquoise Tiffany box needed to meet those standards. In contrast, unique brand names are considered to be inherently distinctive and are accorded almost automatic protection (examples are Zoom® for videoconferencing or Charmin® for toilet paper).

By carefully reviewing  Supreme Court precedents, the Federal Circuit found that the high court never explicitly “addressed whether a multi-color mark applied to product packaging can be inherently distinctive.” Therefore, there was no blanket prohibition on registration without proof of acquired distinctiveness. While colors standing alone (without the packaging) are not inherently distinctive, the combination of multiple distinct colors on packaging may be protectable. Similarly, colors on a product may be distinctive and thus entitled to trademark protection, such as the famous red sole of Christian Louboutin shoes.

Brands creating new packaging using colors should understand that this is a fairly narrow decision by only one appellate court, although it is somewhat consistent with another recent case from a different appellate court. A guiding principle for designers (and legal teams) is whether they can convince the USPTO or a court that the proposed mark is not just a “color mark” requiring proof of long-term use, sales, and advertising but is also a “symbol” designating the origin of the goods. Put another way, the overall impression created by the combination of colors and the pattern created by those colors still must be sufficiently unique to identify the source of the goods inside the package. 

How will the USPTO and courts in other circuits interpret this case? Time after time, cases like this one embolden brands to file trademark registration applications. The USPTO is bound by this decision unless it files an appeal to the Supreme Court. This ruling also will influence pre-litigation strategies, such as choosing a jurisdiction and conducting consumer recognition surveys. 

The case is In re Forney Industries, Inc., Fed. Cir. No. 19-1073 (April 8, 2020).

sidebar

pdfemail

Related People

Media item: James H. Donoian
James H. Donoian

Partner

Related Services

Intellectual Property
Subscribe to our Insights
McCarter & English, LLP
Copyright © 2023 McCarter & English, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
  • Login
  • Attorney Advertising
  • Privacy
  • Awards Methodology
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Sitemap

The McCarter & English, LLP website is for informational purposes only. We do not provide legal advice on this website. We can provide legal advice only to our clients in specific inquiries that they address to us. If you are interested in becoming a client, please contact us, but do not send any information about your specific legal question. We cannot serve as your lawyers until we establish an attorney-client relationship, which can occur only after we follow procedures within our firm and after we agree to the terms of the representation.

Accept Cancel