• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

McCarter & English Logo

  • People
  • Services
  • Insights
  • Our Firm
    • Leadership Team
    • Social Justice
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Pro Bono
    • Client Service Values
  • Join Us
    • Lawyers
    • Summer Associates
    • Patent Professionals
    • Professional Staff
    • Job Openings
  • Locations
    • Boston
    • Philadelphia
    • East Brunswick
    • Stamford
    • Hartford
    • Trenton
    • Newark
    • Washington, DC
    • New York
    • Wilmington
  • Share

Share

Browse Alphabetically:

  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • E
  • F
  • G
  • H
  • I
  • J
  • K
  • L
  • M
  • N
  • O
  • P
  • Q
  • R
  • S
  • T
  • U
  • V
  • W
  • X
  • Y
  • Z
  • All
Bankruptcy, Restructuring & Litigation
Blockchain, Smart Contracts & Digital Currencies
Business Litigation
Cannabis
Coronavirus Resource Center
Corporate
Crisis Management
Cybersecurity & Data Privacy
Delaware Corporate, LLC & Partnership Law
Design, Fashion & Luxury
E-Discovery & Records Management
Energy & Utilities
Environment & Energy
Financial Institutions
Government Affairs
Government Contracts & Global Trade
Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
Healthcare
Immigration
Impact Investing
Insurance Recovery, Litigation & Counseling
Intellectual Property
Labor & Employment Law
Life Sciences
Manufacturing
Products Liability, Mass Torts & Consumer Class Actions
Proptech
Public Finance 
Real Estate
Renewable Energy
Sports & Entertainment
Tax & Employee Benefits 
Technology Transactions
Transportation, Logistics & Supply Chain Management
Trusts, Estates & Private Clients 
Venture Capital & Emerging Growth Companies
  • Broadcasts
  • Events
  • News
  • Publications
  • View All Insights
Search By:
Insights News Contracts Stack
Main image for Pleading Failures Doom Disclosure Claims in Short-Form Merger Case
Publications|Alert

Pleading Failures Doom Disclosure Claims in Short-Form Merger Case

Delaware Law Update

2.8.2017

Vice Chancellor Tamika R. Montgomery-Reeves of the Delaware Court of Chancery (the “Court”) issued a Memorandum Opinion on January 4, 2017, dismissing a lawsuit arising from a short-form merger involving United Capital Corporation (“United Capital” or the “Company”).  A.F. Petrocelli, chairman of the board of directors (the “Board”), president, CEO of the Company, and owner of 94 percent of United Capital’s outstanding shares, offered to purchase the Company’s minority shares through a short-form merger.  The Company’s Board formed a Special Committee that approved the transaction, and stockholders received written notice of the transaction (the “Notice”), which included “financial statements, management’s analysis of the Company’s financial status, the background of the merger, and potential Board and Special Committee conflicts.”  In the consolidated class action lawsuit, the lead stockholder-plaintiff alleged that deficiencies with the Notice gave rise to breaches of the duty of disclosure. 

The Court began by reciting the standards applicable to short-form mergers under 8 Del. C. § 253.  “Although fiduciaries are not required to establish entire fairness in a short-form merger,” the Court explained, “the company must notify the minority of the availability of appraisal rights,” provide a copy of the appraisal statute, and disclose “information material to the decision of whether or not to seek appraisal . . .” 

The Court determined that the Notice “contained sufficient information for stockholders to decide whether to seek appraisal,” but the plaintiff argued that various material facts had been omitted.  Among other things, the plaintiff asked for an inference that undisclosed financial projections existed because of forward-looking information contained in the Notice.  The Court rejected this argument because the plaintiff failed to identify specific facts to support the allegation. 

The plaintiff also argued that the Notice failed to specifically disclose that two of the three independent members of the Special Committee had “long personal, professional, and financial ties with Petrocelli.”  The Court rejected this argument as well because the Notice “reveal[ed] the Special Committee’s existence, outline[d] its negotiation process, disclose[d] . . . potential conflicts, provide[d] financial and business information necessary to inform stockholders about whether to seek appraisal, and [did] not deceive stockholders into relying primarily on the Special Committee.” 

This decision provides at least two insights.  First, while Delaware is a “notice pleading” jurisdiction, and the Court of Chancery will generally deny a motion to dismiss if a complaint presents a “reasonably conceivable set of circumstances” upon which the plaintiff may prevail, plaintiffs cannot rely on conclusory, unsupported allegations to support their claims.  Instead, and even though the Court will give the plaintiff the benefit of all reasonable inferences, claims must be supported by specific allegations of fact.  Second, United Capital serves as a reminder that appraisal is generally the only remedy available to stockholders in a short–form merger, and that even where potentially significant facts have not been disclosed (such as the specifics of personal relationships underlying disclosed conflicts), pleading disclosure violations can be difficult. 

sidebar

pdfemail

Related People

Media item: Benjamin A. Smyth
Benjamin A. Smyth

Partner

Related Services

Delaware Corporate, LLC & Partnership Law
Corporate
Subscribe to our Insights
McCarter & English, LLP
Copyright © 2021 McCarter & English, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
  • Login
  • Attorney Advertising
  • Privacy
  • Awards Methodology
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Sitemap

The McCarter & English, LLP website is for informational purposes only. We do not provide legal advice on this website. We can provide legal advice only to our clients in specific inquiries that they address to us. If you are interested in becoming a client, please contact us, but do not send any information about your specific legal question. We cannot serve as your lawyers until we establish an attorney-client relationship, which can occur only after we follow procedures within our firm and after we agree to the terms of the representation.

Accept Cancel