• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

McCarter & English Logo

  • People
  • Services
  • Insights
  • Our Firm
    • Leadership Team
    • Social Justice
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
    • Pro Bono
    • Client Service Values
    • Alumni
  • Join Us
    • Lawyers
    • Summer Associates
    • Patent Professionals
    • Professional Staff
    • Job Openings
  • Locations
    • Boston
    • Philadelphia
    • East Brunswick
    • Indianapolis
    • Stamford
    • Hartford
    • Trenton
    • Miami
    • Washington, DC
    • New York
    • Wilmington
    • Newark
  • Share

Share

Browse Alphabetically:

  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • E
  • F
  • G
  • H
  • I
  • J
  • K
  • L
  • M
  • N
  • O
  • P
  • Q
  • R
  • S
  • T
  • U
  • V
  • W
  • X
  • Y
  • Z
  • All
Bankruptcy, Restructuring & Litigation
Blockchain, Smart Contracts & Digital Currencies
Business Litigation
Cannabis
Coronavirus Resource Center
Corporate
Crisis Management
Cybersecurity & Data Privacy
Delaware Corporate, LLC & Partnership Law
Design, Fashion & Luxury
E-Discovery & Records Management
Energy & Utilities
Environment & Energy
Financial Institutions
Food & Beverage
Government Affairs
Government Contracts & Global Trade
Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
Healthcare
Hospitality
Immigration
Impact Investing
Insurance Recovery, Litigation & Counseling
Intellectual Property
Labor & Employment
Life Sciences
Manufacturing
Products Liability, Mass Torts & Consumer Class Actions
Public Finance
Real Estate
Renewable Energy
Sports & Entertainment
Tax & Employee Benefits
Technology Transactions
Transportation, Logistics & Supply Chain Management
Trusts, Estates & Private Clients
Venture Capital & Emerging Growth Companies
  • Broadcasts
  • Events
  • News
  • Publications
  • View All Insights
Search By:
DE Corporate Law
Main image for McCarter Achieves Significant Win In the Delaware Supreme Court for Overstock.com
Publications|Alert

McCarter Achieves Significant Win In the Delaware Supreme Court for Overstock.com

Litigation Alert

6.25.2020

McCarter attorneys recently achieved a significant victory in the Delaware Supreme Court when the Court unanimously reversed a multi-million dollar judgment in a unique case involving both Delaware escheat law and a qui tam action.

On June 24, 2020, the Court unanimously reversed a multimillion-dollar judgment for treble damages, attorneys’ fees, and civil penalties entered against Overstock.com, Inc., and in favor of the State of Delaware and a whistleblower in State of Delaware ex rel. William Sean French v. Card Compliant, et al., Del. Superior Ct. Case No. N13C-06-289; Delaware Supreme Court Case No. 327, 2019. The case stems from a qui tam action brought under the Delaware False Claims & Reporting Act (“DFCRA,” 6 Del. Code Sec. 1201 et seq.) and the Delaware Unclaimed Property Law (“DUPL,” 12 Del. Code Secs. 1101-1224).

The Relator, who had previously worked for Ohio-based defendants CardFact, Ltd. and Card Compliant, Ltd., accused his former employers of creating shell companies and conspiring with numerous retailers (including Overstock.com) to evade obligations to report and return to Delaware the value of unclaimed/unused retail gift cards under the DUPL. The State intervened, alleging that the defendants attempted to circumvent DUPL reporting requirements by forming “cardco” entities in Ohio and Florida (where unredeemed gift card balances do not revert to state coffers), contractually assigning the retailer’s existing obligation to cardholding customers to these entities, and thus terminating/evading the retailers’ obligations to report and account for unclaimed property to the State of Delaware.

The retailer defendants moved for summary judgment, seeking dismissal of all claims in 2017. The defendants argued, among other things, that the assignments to non-Delaware “cardco” entities were legally valid and that the retailers had no duty to report or pay the value of the gift cards under Delaware’s unclaimed property laws. They also argued that the failure to submit unclaimed property reports, even if required, was not a “false statement or record” under the relevant provision of the DFCRA in effect during the period at issue. The trial court denied the motion and most of the defendants settled with the State. Overstock.com was the only defendant to proceed to trial in the civil action.

After a six-day trial, the jury returned a verdict against Overstock.com, finding that Overstock.com violated the applicable provision of the DFCRA (the 2009 version of 6 Del C. Sec. 1201(a)(7)) in each of the years 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013 by not filing unclaimed property reports with the State of Delaware. After statutory trebling, penalties, and attorneys’ fees, the judgment liability against Overstock.com was in excess of $7.5 million.

The Delaware Supreme Court, sitting en banc, unanimously reversed the judgment of the trial court. The Supreme Court addressed only one substantive issue in its ruling: that the evidence presented at trial failed to establish the making or use of a false statement under the applicable version of the DFCRA. Because the failure to file reports does not satisfy the Act’s requirement that a false record or statement be made to avoid, conceal, or decrease and obligation to pay money to the government, the Delaware Supreme Court held that the jury award was based on an erroneous legal instruction and a failure of proof and it reversed the judgment.

The McCarter team representing Overstock.com included Michael P. Kelly and Matthew Wright and associates Hayley J. Reese and Matthew J. Rifino.

sidebar

pdfemail

Related People

Media item: Michael P. Kelly
Michael P. Kelly

In Memoriam

Media item: Matthew Wright
Matthew Wright

Partner

Media item: Matthew J. Rifino
Matthew J. Rifino

Special Counsel

Media item: Hayley J. Reese
Hayley J. Reese

Associate

Related Services

Business Litigation
Subscribe to our Insights
McCarter & English, LLP
Copyright © 2023 McCarter & English, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
  • Login
  • Attorney Advertising
  • Privacy
  • Awards Methodology
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Sitemap

The McCarter & English, LLP website is for informational purposes only. We do not provide legal advice on this website. We can provide legal advice only to our clients in specific inquiries that they address to us. If you are interested in becoming a client, please contact us, but do not send any information about your specific legal question. We cannot serve as your lawyers until we establish an attorney-client relationship, which can occur only after we follow procedures within our firm and after we agree to the terms of the representation.

Accept Cancel